Confessions of a Reformed BIBLiophile (continued)
through the propaganda as soon as the propaganda is seen for what
it is. Because the absolute truth lies behind the Bible, rather
than in a doctrine of biblical inerrancy, then I do not risk losing
the truth if I question what the Bible appears to say.
Returning to the subject of J M Smith's Guardian article, I do
not doubt that the selection of the New Testament canon was politically
motivated, as he implies. I said as much in one of my previous articles,
but I do not believe that the New Testament writers themselves were
in on the plot. They never imagined that their writings would end
up being printed on gold edged paper, and they had no ambitions
to become best selling authors. They wrote sincerely, but they wrote
with a purpose in mind. They intended to convey their beliefs and
they would not have been ashamed of their bias. They were as selective
with their material as anyone would be who was trying to set out
a case, but they were not aiming to deceive. The same must have
been true of many of the ancient gospels and letters which did not
get into the Bible. I am sure also that these men were recipients
of divine inspiration, but it was their ideas that were inspired,
not their actual words. They were also capable of adding thoughts,
glosses and opinions of their own and, where history was concerned,
of misunderstanding their sources. They were as human as we are,
and the Spirit did not override their humanity any more than he
does in our lives today. But their humanity could not hide the truth
that motivated their words and actions. The truth shines through.
Because of my personal struggles I can readily understand the concern
that many faithful people have to see that the Bible's authority
is upheld. Clearly the Bible has had times of usefulness in counteracting
evil (this sounds like an understatement!) and its revolutionary
potential has frequently led to its suppression. Those who have
been risking life and limb to take it to persecuted peoples (See
Note 5) cannot easily concur with a view that diminishes
its importance. Those who, like me, have centred their lives on
the Bible are also going to feel considerable anguish at the prospect
of having their foundations shaken, Changing the metaphor, we cannot
easily shift our centre of gravity without experiencing a fear of
falling. The example of traditional liberals tends not to be attractive.
Their quotations from other sources are no adequate replacement
for biblical authority, and their presentation of a God who cannot
perform wonders leaves us asking who needs such a God. Whether the
source of our enlightenment is in nature, in human lives or in literature
it is the sense of wonder that underlies all spiritual experience.
|